A study of birth outcomes in women with hearing loss, published in the August 2016 edition of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, finds significant differences when compared to women without hearing loss. The new study from Brandeis University found that women with hearing loss were significantly more likely to have premature babies and babies with low birth weight. The researchers say that understanding and addressing the causes are critical to improving pregnancy outcomes among women with hearing loss.
According to the researchers, around 1% of people in the US who are 18 to 44 years old have hearing loss of various types, severity, pattern, and age of onset. Many individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing can have significant health issues, while communication and language barriers, along with a general mistrust of the medical community, can result in social and healthcare marginalization for many.
Hearing issues reduce opportunities for individuals to benefit from mass media, healthcare messages, healthcare communication, and incidental learning opportunities. Further, healthcare providers rarely receive training on how to communicate effectively and care for individuals with hearing loss, resulting in poor communication, increased provider frustrations, and changes in healthcare delivery.
“There have not yet been any population-based studies about pregnancy experiences and outcomes among women with hearing loss, although a recent study of deaf women’s experiences with prenatal care found they were less satisfied with their care and were more likely to have fewer prenatal visits than hearing women,” said lead investigator Monika Mitra, PhD, of the Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, Mass. “We therefore set out to investigate birth outcomes among women with hearing loss.”
Researchers examined the 2008–2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) to compare birth outcomes in women with and without hearing loss. Of nearly 18 million deliveries, about 10,500 were among women with hearing loss. Babies born to women with hearing loss were significantly more likely to have preterm birth and low birth weight.
Women with hearing loss are more likely to be publicly insured and can qualify for both Medicare and Social Security Disability Insurance on the basis of a “hearing disability,” especially if that “disability” prevents successful employment. Medicare and Medicaid were the most common payers for delivery hospitalizations among women with hearing loss, but private insurance was most common among women without hearing loss. Nearly one in seven women with hearing loss had their births paid for by Medicare, which was significantly higher than Medicare coverage for women without hearing loss (13.3% versus 0.6%). Women with hearing loss were almost two times more likely to have one or more coexisting health issues and were also more likely to be admitted to urban teaching hospitals.
“A recent perinatal health framework developed by our team identified a set of individual and mediating factors that may impact maternal and birth outcomes for women with physical disabilities,” said Mitra. “Mediating factors, for example, include provider knowledge and attitudes toward pregnancy, family support, and psychosocial factors such as stressful life events. Although these factors are not identifiable in the HCUP data, this framework may be also applicable to women with hearing loss.”
Mitra explained that, given the earlier studies on patient–provider communication, potential biological factors, interpersonal violence, and health knowledge and health literacy among people with hearing loss, and the general dissatisfaction of people with hearing loss with their healthcare, these factors could potentially explain the poor birth outcomes found in this study. She emphasized that efforts to develop clinical interventions and maternal and child health programs are needed to improve these adverse outcomes among women with hearing loss.
Source: Brandeis University; American Journal of Preventive Medicine; Elsevier
Image credits: Huntstock; Brandeis University